A BEEMIAN SAMPLER: 1966~2002 17 for the concept of a nonspacelike asymptotic geodesic ray in which the point x cor- responding to the point p above was allowed to vary in the limit construction: DEFINITION 6 .1. A future co~my to "( from x will be a causal curve starting at x which is future inextendible and is the limit curve of a sequence of maximal length timelike geodesic segments from Xn to "f(rn) for two sequences {xn}, {rn} with Xn--+ x and rn--+ +oo. To cope with the technicalities discussed above, the concept of the timelike co-my condition was also formulated. DEFINITION 6.2. The globally hyperbolic space-time (M, g) satisfies the time- like co-my condition for the timelike line "( : ( -oo, +oo) --+ ( M, g) if, for each x in I("() = I+("() n I-("(), all future and past co-rays to "( from x are timelike. Perhaps it is time to reveal the analytic definition of the Busemann function corresponding to the future timelike geodesic ray "fl[o,+oo): (6.2) (b,)+(x) = lim (r- d(x,"((r))). r-oo As mentioned in Section 4, the space-time distance function is generally less tractable than the Riemannian distance function. Hence, even issues such as conti- nuity are less obvious. However, it was established in [25] that the timelike co-ray condition implied the continuity of the Busemann functions on I("(). Moreover, making the stronger hypothesis that all timelike sectional curvatures were nonpos- itive, it was established that the timelike co-ray condition holds on all of I("(), so that each of b+, b-, and B = b+ + b- is continuous on I("(). Thanks to the aid of the powerful Toponogov Theorem for globally hyperbolic space-times with nonpositive timelike sectional curvatures, established in Harris [62], [63], it was also possible to prove that all past and future timelike co-rays to the given timelike geodesic line were complete. Hence, under the timelike sectional curvature hypothesis rather than the more desirable Ricci curvature hypothesis, one had what the first author liked to think of as "large scale control of the geometry on all of I ("f)." From this, one could obtain the splitting of I("() as a metric product (I("(), g)= (JR X H, -dt2 +h) where (H, h) was any level set of the Busemann function in the induced metric. (In Riemannian geometry, the corresponding level sets are called "horospheres.") Finally, by inextendibility arguments, one deduced that I("() = M. What are some geometric issues hidden in the proofs involved in the B = b+ +b- theory? Let"( be a complete timelike line as above and let p E I("(). Form a future timelike co-ray c1 to "fl[o,+oo) and form a past timelike co-ray c2 to "fl[o,-oo)' both starting at p. Then the biggest geometric issue is, why does it happen that (6.3) so that c1 and c2 join together at p to form a smooth geodesic? Secondly, why is the geodesic globally maximal? Once these things have been established, then one can view the factor lR of the splitting as being formed geometrically by the collection of all of these asymptotic past and future rays to "( fitting together properly and H as any level set of the Busemann function.

Purchased from American Mathematical Society for the exclusive use of nofirst nolast (email unknown) Copyright 2004 American Mathematical Society. Duplication prohibited. Please report unauthorized use to cust-serv@ams.org. Thank You! Your purchase supports the AMS' mission, programs, and services for the mathematical community.