xx Preface to the first edition c. Understanding generalized solutions is fundamental. Many of the partial differential equations we study, especially nonlinear first-order equa- tions, do not in general possess smooth solutions. It is therefore essential to devise some kind of proper notion of generalized or weak solution. This is an important but subtle undertaking, and much of the hardest material in this book concerns the uniqueness of appropriately defined weak solutions. d. PDE theory is not a branch of functional analysis. Whereas certain classes of equations can profitably be viewed as generating abstract operators between Banach spaces, the insistence on an overly abstract view- point, and consequent ignoring of deep calculus and measure theoretic esti- mates, is ultimately limiting. e. Notation is a nightmare. I have really tried to introduce consistent notation, which works for all the important classes of equations studied. This attempt is sometimes at variance with notational conventions within a given subarea. f. Good theory is (almost) as useful as exact formulas. I incorporate this principle into the overall organization of the text, which is subdivided into three parts, roughly mimicking the historical development of PDE the- ory itself. Part I concerns the search for explicit formulas for solutions, and Part II the abandoning of this quest in favor of general theory asserting the existence and other properties of solutions for linear equations. Part III is the mostly modern endeavor of fashioning general theory for important classes of nonlinear PDE. Let me also explicitly comment here that I intend the development within each section to be rigorous and complete (exceptions being the frankly heuristic treatment of asymptotics in §4.5 and an occasional reference to a research paper). This means that even locally within each chapter the topics do not necessarily progress logically from “easy” to “hard” concepts. There are many diﬃcult proofs and computations early on, but as compensation many easier ideas later. The student should certainly omit on first reading some of the more arcane proofs. I wish next to emphasize that this is a textbook, and not a reference book. I have tried everywhere to present the essential ideas in the clearest possible settings, and therefore have almost never established sharp versions of any of the theorems. Research articles and advanced monographs, many of them listed in the Bibliography, provide such precision and generality. My goal has rather been to explain, as best I can, the many fundamental ideas of the subject within fairly simple contexts.

Purchased from American Mathematical Society for the exclusive use of nofirst nolast (email unknown) Copyright 2010 American Mathematical Society. Duplication prohibited. Please report unauthorized use to cust-serv@ams.org. Thank You! Your purchase supports the AMS' mission, programs, and services for the mathematical community.