0. Differentiability and the Cauchy-Riemann Equations 7
0.6. Suppose that / is differentiate at z and that g is differentiate at f(z).
Show that the composition g o f is differentiable at z1 with
Note. An obvious approach to Exercise 6 is to write
(g(f(z))-g(f(w))\ /f(z)-f(w)\
z-w \ f(z)-f(w) J\ z-w J
and use Exercise 2, which shows that f(w) tends to f(z) as w approaches z.
There is a slight problem with this approach: It may happen that f(w) =
f(z) for w near z, in which case we are dividing by 0.
If you don't see how tofixthis problem, you can find the solution in any
calculus book. Better is to simply avoid the problem by using Exercise 0.1
instead of the definition of the derivative via quotients!
A slightly informal version of a solution using Exercise 0.1 would use the
exercise twice to show that
go f(z + h) = g(f(z) + f'(z)h + o(h))
= /(/(*)) + g'(f(z))(f(z)h + o(h)) + o(f'(z)h + o(h))
= 9(f(z)) + g'(f(z))f(z)h + g'(f(z))o(h) + o(f'(z)h + o(h))
= g(f(z)) + g'(f(z))f'(z)h + o(h),
and then invoke the exercise once more to conclude that (g o

g'{f(z))f'{z). The whole point of this "o" notation is to allow one to per-
form this sort of manipulation with error terms. However, if we're new to
all this we probably want to give a more careful argument; in this regard
you might note that f(z + h) = f(z) +
+ o(h) holds if and only if
f(z + h) f(z) +
+ E(h), where E satisfies this condition: For every
e 0 there exists S 0 such that \E(h)\ e\h\ for all h with \h\ S. (The
point to the rephrasing is to avoid the division in the definition of "o(/i)".)
The next two exercises illustrate the problems that arise in attempting to
give a version of Proposition 0.1 involving only partial derivatives (without
extra hypotheses like continuity of the partials).
0.7. Define / : C - C by
ro (x = o),
f(x + iy)=l 0 fo = 0),
v 1 (otherwise).
Show that / satisfies the Cauchy-Riemann equations at the origin although
/ is not complex-differentiable at the origin.
Previous Page Next Page