CHAPTER 1 Introduction The irreducible spherical buildings of rank at least three have been classified by J. Tits in 1974 [15]. The irreducible spherical buildings of rank two - which are called generalized polygons - are too numerous to classify, but in the addenda of [15], the Moufang condition for spherical buildings was introduced, and it was observed that every thick irreducible spherical building of rank at least three as well as every irreducible residue of such a building satisfies the Moufang condition. In this sense, the Moufang polygons are the "building bricks" of any spherical building of rank at least three. Very recently, the classification of Moufang polygons has been completed by J. Tits and R. Weiss in [20]. It was first shown by J. Tits (see [17] and [18]) that Moufang n-gons exist for n G {3,4,6,8} only see also [21]. For n 6 {3,6,8}, the proof is divided into two parts, namely (A) it is shown that a Moufang n-gon can be parametrized by a certain algebraic structure, and (B) these algebraic structures are classified. More precisely, it was already shown in 1933 (but in a slightly different form see [2] or [5]) by R. Moufang (see [11]) that all Moufang triangles can be described by an alternative division ring, a notion which had been introduced by M. Zorn (see [22]). These alternative division rings were classified by R. Bruck and E. Kleinfeld in 1951 see [3]. The Moufang hexagons are described by unital quadratic Jordan division algebras of degree three, also known as anisotropic cubic norm structures (see [16]). These structures have been classified in its full generality in 1986 by H. Petersson and M. Racine (see [13] and [14]), whose proof is built on earlier work by A. Albert [1], F.D. Jacobson and N. Jacobson [6], N. Jacobson [7], [8] and K. McCrimmon [9], [10]. The Moufang octagons, finally, can be described by a so-called octagonal system, as was shown by J. Tits in 1983 (see [19]) since these systems have a very simple description, there is no need for part (B) in this case. The classification of Moufang quadrangles (n=4) in [20] is not organized in this way due to the absence of a suitable algebraic structure. Instead, there are six different parameter systems, and even then, the division of the proof into parts (A) and (B) is missing in the two cases which lead to the exceptional quadrangles. Surprisingly, one of these classes, namely the exceptional quadrangles of type F4, had only recently been discovered by R. Weiss during the classification process see also [12]. The goal of this article is to present a uniform algebraic structure for Mou- fang quadrangles. These "quadrangular systems" reveal some of the structure of Moufang quadrangles which is hard to see without them. For example, we have successfully used them to answer a basic question about the automorphism group of the Moufang quadrangles of type F4 left open in (37.38) of [20] see [4]. More- over, it is possible to classify these structures without referring back to the original

Purchased from American Mathematical Society for the exclusive use of nofirst nolast (email unknown) Copyright 2005 American Mathematical Society. Duplication prohibited. Please report unauthorized use to cust-serv@ams.org. Thank You! Your purchase supports the AMS' mission, programs, and services for the mathematical community.