1.2. INTRINSIC APPROAC H T O TH E HEISENBERG CALCULUS 3
(®fc/nAfl)©A^
1
0 A^
2
of horizontal forms. The contact Laplacian is a differential
operator of order 2 in degree k ^ n and of order 4 in degree n.
In the examples (a)-(c) the operators are instances of sublaplacians. More
precisely, a sublaplacian is a second order differential A : C°°(M,£) » C°°(M,£)
which near any point a G M is of the form,
d d
(1.1.2) A = - J2 Xj ~ il*(x)X0 + ] T aj(x)Xj + 6(x),
where Xo, X i , . . . , Xj is a local frame of TM such that X\,..., X^ span H and the
coefficients /x(x) and ai(x),..., a^(x), 6(x) are local sections of End£.
1.2. Intrinsic approach to the Heisenberg calculus
Although the differential operators above may be hypoelliptic under some con-
ditions, they are definitely not elliptic. Therefore, we cannot rely on the standard
pseudodifferential calculus to study these operators.
The substitute to the standard pseudodifferential calculus is provided by the
Heisenberg calculus, independently introduced by Beals-Greiner [BG] and Tay-
lor [Tay] (see also [Bol], [CGGP], [Dyl], [Dy2], [EM], [FSl], [RS]). The idea
in the Heisenberg calculus, which goes back to Elias Stein, is the following. Since
the relevant notion of tangent structure for a Heisenberg manifold (M, H) is that
of a bundle GM of 2-step nilpotent graded Lie groups, it stands for reason to con-
struct a pseudodifferential calculus which at every point x G M is well modelled by
the calculus of convolution operators on the nilpotent tangent group GXM.
The result is a class of pseudodifferential operators, the ^HDOS, which are
locally ^DOs of type (|, | ) , but unlike the latter possess a full symbolic calculus
and makes sense on a general Heisenberg manifold. In particular, a \I/#DO admits
a parametrix in the Heisenberg calculus if, and only if, its principal symbol is
invertible, and then the \I/#DO is hypoelliptic with a gain of derivatives controlled
by its order (see Section 3.1 for a detailed review of the Heisenberg calculus).
1.2.1. Intrinsic notion of principal symbol. In [BG] and [Tay] the prin-
cipal symbol of a \£#E)0 is defined in local coordinates only, so the definition a
priori depends on the choice of these coordinates. In the special case of a contact
manifold, an intrinsic definition have been given in [EM] and [EMM] as a section
over a bundle of jets of vector fields representing the tangent group bundle of the
contact manifold. This approach is similar to that of Melrose [Me2] in the setting
of the 6-calculus for manifolds with boundary.
In this paper we give an intrinsic definition of the principal symbol, valid for
an arbitrary Heisenberg manifold, using the results of [Po6].
Let (M
d + 1
,if) be a Heisenberg manifold. As shown in [Po6] the tangent Lie
group bundle of (M, H) can be described as the bundle (TM/H) 0 H together with
the grading and group law such that, for sections XQ, YQ of TM/H and sections
X ; , Yf of H, we have
(1.2.1) t.(X0 + Xf) = t2X0 + tX\ t e R,
(1.2.2) (X0 + X').(Yo + Y') = X0 + ^o + \C(X',
Yf)
+ X' + Y',
Previous Page Next Page