11.2. Another, related, approach to perturbative quantum field the-
ory on Riemannian space-times was developed by Hollands (Hol09) and
Hollands-Olbermann (HO09). In this approach the field theory is encoded
in a vertex algebra on the space-time manifold.
This seems to be philosophically very closely related to my joint work
with Owen Gwilliam (CG10), which uses the renormalization techniques
developed in this paper to produce a factorization algebra on the space-time
manifold. Thus, the quantization results proved by Hollands-Olbermann
should be close analogues of the results presented here.
11.3. D. Tamarkin (Tam03) also develops an approach to renormaliza-
tion of quantum field theory based on the theory of vertex algebras and on
the Batalin-Vilkovisky formalism. Tamarkin’s approach, again, seems to be
closely related to both the work of Hollands-Olbermann and my joint work
with Gwilliam.
11.4. In a lecture at the conference “Renormalization: algebraic, geo-
metric and probabilistic aspects” in Lyon in 2010, Maxim Kontsevich pre-
sented an approach to perturbative renormalization which he developed
some years before. The output of Kontsevich’s construction is (as in (HO09)
and (CG10)) a vertex algebra on the space-time manifold. The form of Kont-
sevich’s theorem is very similar to the main theorem of this book: order by
order in , the space of possible quantizations is a torsor for an Abelian
group constructed from certain Lagrangians. Kontsevich’s work relies on a
new construction of counterterms which, like the Epstein-Glaser construc-
tion and the construction developed here, relies on working in real space
rather than on momentum space.
Again, it is natural to speculate that there is a close relationship between
Kontsevich’s work and the construction of factorization algebras presented
in (CG10).
11.5. Let me finally mention an approach to perturbative renormaliza-
tion developed initially by Connes and Kreimer (CK98; CK99), and further
developed by (among others) Connes-Marcolli (CM04; CM08b) and van
Suijlekom (vS07). The first result of this approach is that the Bogoliubov-
Parasiuk-Hepp-Zimmermann (BP57; Hep66) algorithm has a beautiful in-
terpretation in terms of the Birkhoff decomposition for loops in a certain
pro-algebraic group constructed combinatorially from graphs.
In this book, however, counterterms have no intrinsic importance: they
are simply a technical tool used to prove the main results. Thus, it is not
clear to me if there is any relationship between Connes-Kreimer Hopf algebra
and the results of this book.
Many people have contributed to the material in this book. Without
the constant encouragement and insightful editorial suggestions of Lauren
Previous Page Next Page